Jack Dorsey who effortlessly came across as just the type of man who would sell his sister to slave traders, blurted out his insidious plan, occasionally referencing he who cannot be named, babbling on about…
“ONE ACCOUNT – this one account – and to infinite and beyond one account!”
like some half-baked smack-head wizard. He went on to say,
“Ve have vays of silencing all decent…
Exterminate the QAnons!!
Oops sorry, wrong tape, but you get the gist.
This absolute danger really should be sectioned.
What next for King Rat, now that he has solipsistically rid the world of Trump?
Buy Greenland before?
Rebuild The Fatherland?
A final solution for cats and Jack Russell Terriers?
The_Void’s hopes are stacked on him fulfilling his lifelong ambition to travel in space.
Fingers crossed he’ll be on the first mission to Mars. Stored in a jar.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/a27d24_1753b901221b4a30b63399bf70ed58ee_mv2.jpg573894Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-15 22:28:152021-01-16 03:30:43Jack The Rat Gets Caught In A Trap | Opinion
In a secret recording from Jan. 8, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey admitted that the big tech company is exploring a long-term political censorship campaign to purge and ban users the company deems unacceptable.
“The focus is certainly on this account, and how it ties to real-world violence, but also we need to think much longer-term around how these dynamics play out over time,”
Dorsey said, referring in context to President Donald Trump’s account.
“I don’t believe this is going away any time soon.”
In the short video, obtained and published by Project Veritas, Dorsey reportedly addressed his employees about the Silicon Valley giant’s efforts to censor, ban, and de-platform certain users such as President Donald Trump and other conservatives. In the recording, Dorsey pledged to expand Twitter’s purge in the days following President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration.
“We know we are focused on one account right now, but this is going to be much bigger than just one account, and it’s going to go on for much longer than just this day, this week, the next few weeks, going on beyond inauguration,”
“We have to expect that. We have to be ready for that.”
BREAKING: @Twitter Insider Secretly Records CEO @jack Detailing Agenda For Further Political Censorship
In addition to banning the sitting president and removing more than 70,000 accounts that Twitter claimed were linked to or amplified QAnon conspiracy theories, Dorsey said the heads of the company are exploring banning more users.
“The moves that we’re making today, around, you know, QAnon, for instance, is one such example of a much broader approach that we should be looking at and going deeper on,”
“The team has a lot of work and a lot of focus on this particular issue, but we also need to give them the space and the support to focus on the much bigger picture because it is, it is not going away.”
“The U.S. is extremely divided. Our platform is showing up every single day. And our role is to protect the integrity of that conversation and do what we can to make sure that no one is being harmed based off that,”
Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/23709-retrieved-featured-image.png7501000The Managerhttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgThe Manager2021-01-15 12:05:512021-01-15 12:30:03Twitter CEO Says Censorship Will Be ‘Much Bigger’ Than The Trump Ban | The Federalist
It’s incredible how easily corporations adapt to fascism.
It also goes a long way to explain Mercedes, Deutsche Bank, and Bayer’s behaviour during the second world war.
It’s How They Roll | The_Void
Despite previous government denials that there are any plans to roll out COVID vaccine passports, reports have confirmed that every person vaccinated in two select areas of Britain will be offered exactly that as a ‘trial’ being rolled out with immediate effect.
The London Telegraph reports that biometrics firm iProov and cybersecurity firm Mvine have developed the vaccine passports, which will be optionally provided as an app on phones of those vaccinated.
The government will conduct the rollout in two local authorities, and monitor its application until March.
The report notes that the government has ploughed £75,000 into the trial already, which is claimed to be a way of monitoring who has had the vaccine.
Frank Joshi, director and founder of Mvine noted that while the project started as just a way of keeping a record of COVID tests, extra funding was pumped into it in order to turn it into a vaccine passport scheme.
“Originally we started off with this need to prove whether you’ve had an antibody test, but it can be equally used to demonstrate whether you’ve been vaccinated,”
Joshi said, according to the report.
Andrew Bud, chief executive of the other company involved, iProov, said that the system will be integrated with the National Health Service, and could easily be rolled out to everyone in the country.
“We’re talking about a piece of remarkable technology that can be brought to bear and can be readily integrated with the NHS,”
“Those who refuse to get the Covid-19 jab would likely be refused entry to venues, as part of the same proposals.”
Other reports have suggested that an app already used prominently in the UK by people to book doctor and hospital appointments could implement a vaccination status section that will show whether a person has taken the coronavirus jab or not, and that businesses may use it to refuse entry to those who have not.
The spectre of so called ‘immunity passports’ is looming globally.
Yesterday it was revealed that Denmark is the latest country to announce that it is rolling out a ‘Covid passport’, to allow those who have taken the vaccine to engage in society without any restrictions.
Sam Grant, campaign manager at the civili liberties advocacy group Liberty has warned that
“any form of immunity passport risks creating a two-tier system in which some of us have access to freedoms and support while others are shut out.”
“These systems could result in people who don’t have immunity potentially being blocked from essential public services, work or housing – with the most marginalised among us hardest hit,”
Grant further warned.
“This has wider implications too because any form of immunity passport could pave the way for a full ID system – an idea which has repeatedly been rejected as incompatible with building a rights-respecting society,”
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/23453-130121hsbc1.jpg420800Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-13 14:54:522021-01-14 15:24:11HSBC Says Customers Who Don’t Wear Face Masks Could Have Their Accounts Terminated | Summit News
Glenn Greenwald: How silicon valley, in a show of monopolistic force, destroyed Parler in a calculated attack.
Silicon Valley is the home of The Fourth Reich.
Greenwald’s excellent piece draws the stark contrast between the tech monopolies and successful new enterprises. Like every fascist that has gone before them, big tech crushes any opposition or threat to their business. It really is time for the public to abandon these sinister organisation and stand up for the individual and freedom. If not stopped now, who’s to say these tyrannical giants won’t be forming their own armies to crush us all.
Critics of Silicon Valley censorship for years heard the same refrain: tech platforms like Facebook, Google and Twitter are private corporations and can host or ban whoever they want. If you don’t like what they are doing, the solution is not to complain or to regulate them. Instead, go create your own social media platform that operates the way you think it should.
The founders of Parler heard that suggestion and tried. In August, 2018, they created a social media platform similar to Twitter but which promised far greater privacy protections, including a refusal to aggregate user data in order to monetize them to advertisers or algorithmically evaluate their interests in order to promote content or products to them. They also promised far greater free speech rights, rejecting the increasingly repressive content policing of Silicon Valley giants.
Over the last year, Parler encountered immense success. Millions of people who objected to increasing repression of speech on the largest platforms or who had themselves been banned signed up for the new social media company.
As Silicon Valley censorship radically escalated over the past several months — banning pre-election reporting by The New York Post about the Biden family, denouncing and deleting multiple posts from the U.S. President and then terminating his access altogether, mass-removal of right-wing accounts — so many people migrated to Parler that it was catapulted to the number one spot on the list of most-downloaded apps on the Apple Play Store, the sole and exclusive means which iPhone users have to download apps. “Overall, the app was the 10th most downloaded social media app in 2020 with 8.1 million new installs,” reported TechCrunch.
It looked as if Parler had proven critics of Silicon Valley monopolistic power wrong. Their success showed that it was possible after all to create a new social media platform to compete with Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. And they did so by doing exactly what Silicon Valley defenders long insisted should be done: if you don’t like the rules imposed by tech giants, go create your own platform with different rules.
But today, if you want to download, sign up for, or use Parler, you will be unable to do so. That is because three Silicon Valley monopolies — Amazon, Google and Apple — abruptly united to remove Parler from the internet, exactly at the moment when it became the most-downloaded app in the country.
If one were looking for evidence to demonstrate that these tech behemoths are, in fact, monopolies that engage in anti-competitive behavior in violation of antitrust laws, and will obliterate any attempt to compete with them in the marketplace, it would be difficult to imagine anything more compelling than how they just used their unconstrained power to utterly destroy a rising competitor.
The united Silicon Valley attack began on January 8, when Apple emailed Parler and gave them 24 hours to prove they had changed their moderation practices or else face removal from their App Store. The letter claimed: “We have received numerous complaints regarding objectionable content in your Parler service, accusations that the Parler app was used to plan, coordinate, and facilitate the illegal activities in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021 that led (among other things) to loss of life, numerous injuries, and the destruction of property.” It ended with this warning:
To ensure there is no interruption of the availability of your app on the App Store, please submit an update and the requested moderation improvement plan within 24 hours of the date of this message. If we do not receive an update compliant with the App Store Review Guidelines and the requested moderation improvement plan in writing within 24 hours, your app will be removed from the App Store.
The 24-hour letter was an obvious pretext and purely performative. Removal was a fait accompli no matter what Parler did. To begin with, the letter was immediately leaked to Buzzfeed, which published it in full. A Parler executive detailed the company’s unsuccessful attempts to communicate with Apple. “They basically ghosted us,” he told me. The next day, Apple notified Parler of its removal from App Store. “We won’t distribute apps that present dangerous and harmful content,” said the world’s richest company, and thus: “We have now rejected your app for the App Store.”
It is hard to overstate the harm to a platform from being removed from the App Store. Users of iPhones are barred from downloading apps onto their devices from the internet. If an app is not on the App Store, it cannot be used on the iPhone. Even iPhone users who have already downloaded Parler will lose the ability to receive updates, which will shortly render the platform both unmanageable and unsafe.
In October, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law issued a 425-page report concluding that Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google all possess monopoly power and are using that power anti-competitively. For Apple, they emphasized the company’s control over iPhones through its control of access to the App Store. As Ars Technicaput it when highlighting the report’s key findings:
Apple controls about 45 percent of the US smartphone market and 20 percent of the global smartphone market, the committee found, and is projected to sell its 2 billionth iPhone in 2021. It is correct that, in the smartphone handset market, Apple is not a monopoly. Instead, iOS and Android hold an effective duopoly in mobile operating systems.
However, the report concludes, Apple does have a monopolistic hold over what you can do with an iPhone. You can only put apps on your phone through the Apple App Store, and Apple has total gatekeeper control over that App Store—that’s what Epic is suing the company over. . . .
The committee found internal documents showing that company leadership, including former CEO Steve Jobs, “acknowledged that IAP requirement would stifle competition and limit the apps available to Apple’s customers.” The report concludes that Apple has also unfairly used its control over APIs, search rankings, and default apps to limit competitors’ access to iPhone users.
Shortly thereafter, Parler learned that Google, without warning, had also “suspended” it from its Play Store, severely limiting the ability of users to download Parler onto Android phones. Google’s actions also meant that those using Parler on their Android phones would no longer receive necessary functionality and security updates.
It was precisely Google’s abuse of its power to control its app device that was at issue “when the European Commission deemed Google LLC as the dominant undertaking in the app stores for the Android mobile operating system (i.e. Google Play Store) and hit the online search and advertisement giant with €4.34 billion for its anti-competitive practices to strengthen its position in various of other markets through its dominance in the app store market.”
The day after a united Apple and Google acted against Parler, Amazon delivered the fatal blow. The company founded and run by the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos, used virtually identical language as Apple to inform Parler that its web hosting service (AWS) was terminating Parler’s ability to have AWS host its site: “Because Parler cannot comply with our terms of service and poses a very real risk to public safety, we plan to suspend Parler’s account effective Sunday, January 10th, at 11:59PM PST.” Because Amazon is such a dominant force in web hosting, Parler has thus far not found a hosting service for its platform, which is why it has disappeared not only from app stores and phones but also from the internet.
On Thursday, Parler was the most popular app in the United States. By Monday, three of the four Silicon Valley monopolies united to destroy it.
With virtual unanimity, leading U.S. liberals celebrated this use of Silicon Valley monopoly power to shut down Parler, just as they overwhelmingly cheered the prior two extraordinary assertions of tech power to control U.S. political discourse: censorship of The New York Post’s reporting on the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, and the banning of the U.S. President from major platforms. Indeed, one would be hard-pressed to find a single national liberal-left politician even expressing concerns about any of this, let alone opposing it.
Not only did leading left-wing politicians not object but some of them were the ones who pleaded with Silicon Valley to use their power this way. After the internet-policing site Sleeping Giants flagged several Parler posts that called for violence, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez asked: “What are @Apple and @GooglePlay doing about this?” Once Apple responded by removing Parler from its App Store — a move that House Democrats just three months earlier warned was dangerous anti-trust behavior — she praised Apple and then demanded to know: “Good to see this development from @Apple. @GooglePlay what are you going to do about apps being used to organize violence on your platform?”
The liberal New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg pronounced herself “disturbed by just how awesome [tech giants’] power is” and added that “it’s dangerous to have a handful of callow young tech titans in charge of who has a megaphone and who does not.” She nonetheless praised these “young tech titans” for using their “dangerous” power to ban Trump and destroy Parler. In other words, liberals like Goldberg are concerned only that Silicon Valley censorship powers might one day be used against people like them, but are perfectly happy as long as it is their adversaries being deplatformed and silenced (Facebook and other platforms have for years banned marginalized people like Palestinians at Israel’s behest, but that is of no concern to U.S. liberals).
That is because the dominant strain of American liberalism is not economic socialism but political authoritarianism. Liberals now want to use the force of corporate power to silence those with different ideologies. They are eager for tech monopolies not just to ban accounts they dislike but to remove entire platforms from the internet. They want to imprison people they believe helped their party lose elections, such as Julian Assange, even if it means creating precedents to criminalize journalism.
World leaders have vocally condemned the power Silicon Valley has amassed to police political discourse, and were particularly indignant over the banning of the U.S. President. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, various French ministers, and especially Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador all denounced the banning of Trump and other acts of censorship by tech monopolies on the ground that they were anointing themselves “a world media power.” The warnings from López Obrador were particularly eloquent:
Even the ACLU — which has rapidly transformed from a civil liberties organization into a liberal activist group since Trump’s election — found the assertion of Silicon Valley’s power to destroy Parler deeply alarming. One of that organization’s most stalwart defenders of civil liberties, lawyer Ben Wizner, toldThe New York Times that the destruction of Parler was more “troubling” than the deletion of posts or whole accounts: “I think we should recognize the importance of neutrality when we’re talking about the infrastructure of the internet.”
Yet American liberals swoon for this authoritarianism. And they are now calling for the use of the most repressive War on Terror measures against their domestic opponents. On Tuesday, House Homeland Security Chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) urged that GOP Sens. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley “be put on the no-fly list,” while The Wall Street Journal reported that “Biden has said he plans to make a priority of passing a law against domestic terrorism, and he has been urged to create a White House post overseeing the fight against ideologically inspired violent extremists and increasing funding to combat them.”
So much of this liberal support for the attempted destruction of Parler is based in utter ignorance about that platform, and about basic principles of free speech. I’d be very surprised if more than a tiny fraction of liberals cheering Parler’s removal from the internet have ever used the platform or know anything about it other than the snippets they have been shown by those seeking to justify its destruction and to depict it as some neo-Nazi stronghold.
Parler was not founded, nor is it run, by pro-Trump, MAGA supporters. The platform was created based in libertarian values of privacy, anti-surveillance, anti-data collection, and free speech. Most of the key executives are more associated with the politics of Ron Paul and the CATO Institute than Steve Bannon or the Trump family. One is a Never Trump Republican, while another is the former campaign manager of Ron Paul and Rand Paul. Among the few MAGA-affiliated figures is Dan Bongino, an investor. One of the key original investors was Rebekah Mercer.
The platform’s design is intended to foster privacy and free speech, not a particular ideology. They minimize the amount of data they collect on users to prevent advertiser monetization or algorithmic targeting. Unlike Facebook and Twitter, they do not assess a user’s preferences in order to decide what they should see. And they were principally borne out of a reaction to increasingly restrictive rules on the major Silicon Valley platforms regarding what could and could not be said.
Of course large numbers of Trump supporters ended up on Parler. That’s not because Parler is a pro-Trump outlet, but because those are among the people who were censored by the tech monopolies or who were angered enough by that censorship to seek refuge elsewhere.
It is true that one can find postings on Parler that explicitly advocate violence or are otherwise grotesque. But that is even more true of Facebook, Google-owned YouTube, and Twitter. And contrary to what many have been led to believe, Parler’s Terms of Service includes a ban on explicit advocacy of violence, and they employ a team of paid, trained moderators who delete such postings. Those deletions do not happen perfectly or instantaneously — which is why one can find postings that violate those rules — but the same is true of every major Silicon Valley platform.
Indeed, a Parler executive told me that of the thirteen people arrested as of Monday for the breach at the Capitol, none appear to be active users of Parler. The Capitol breach was planned far more on Facebook and YouTube. As Recodereported, while some protesters participated in both Parler and Gab, many of the calls to attend the Capitol were from YouTube videos, while many of the key planners “have continued to use mainstream platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.” The article quoted Fadi Quran, campaign director at the human rights group Avaaz, as saying: “In DC, we saw QAnon conspiracists and other militias that would never have grown to this size without being turbo-charged by Facebook and Twitter.”
And that’s to say nothing of the endless number of hypocrisies with Silicon Valley giants feigning opposition to violent rhetoric or political extremism. Amazon, for instance, is one of the CIA’s most profitable partners, with a $600 million contract to provide services to the agency, and it is constantly bidding for more. On Facebook and Twitter, one finds official accounts from the most repressive and violent regimes on earth, including Saudi Arabia, and pages devoted to propaganda on behalf of the Egyptian regime. Does anyone think these tech giants have a genuine concern about violence and extremism?
So why did Democratic politicians and journalists focus on Parler rather than Facebook and YouTube? Why did Amazon, Google and Apple make a flamboyant showing of removing Parler from the internet while leaving much larger platforms with far more extremism and advocacy of violence flowing on a daily basis?
In part it is because these Silicon Valley giants — Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple — donate enormous sums of money to the Democratic Party and their leaders, so of course Democrats will cheer them rather than call for punishment or their removal from the internet. Part of it is because Parler is an upstart, a much easier target to try to destroy than Facebook or Google. And in part it is because the Democrats are about to control the Executive Branch and both houses of Congress, leaving Silicon Valley giants eager to please them by silencing their adversaries. This corrupt motive was made expressly clear by long-time Clinton operative Jennifer Palmieri:
It has not escaped my attention that the day social media companies decided there actually IS more they could do to police Trump’s destructive behavior was the same day they learned Democrats would chair all the congressional committees that oversee them.
The nature of monopolistic power is that anti-competitive entities engage in anti-trust illegalities to destroy rising competitors. Parler is associated with the wrong political ideology. It is a small and new enough platform such that it can be made an example of. Its head can be placed on a pike to make clear that no attempt to compete with existing Silicon Valley monopolies is possible. And its destruction preserves the unchallengeable power of a tiny handful of tech oligarchs over the political discourse not just of the United States but democracies worldwide (which is why Germany, France and Mexico are raising their voices in protest).
No authoritarians believe they are authoritarians. No matter how repressive are the measures they support — censorship, monopoly power, no-fly lists for American citizens without due process — they tell themselves that those they are silencing and attacking are so evil, are terrorists, that anything done against them is noble and benevolent, not despotic and repressive. That is how American liberals currently think, as they fortify the control of Silicon Valley monopolies over our political lives, exemplified by the overnight destruction of a new and popular competitor.
Parler CEO John Matze says, there is now a high probability that Parler will never return.
The Tech giants have literally murdered the best social media platform the net.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/IMG_1249.png575862Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-13 11:59:232021-01-15 03:59:57Why The Fascists of Silicon Valley Murdered Parler | Glenn Greenwald
This is what the leftists, along with those that support their agenda, think about Americans. It’s in their own words. Believe them when they say it.
“Americans are so fucking dumb,” said PBS Principal Counsel Michael Beller, who was chatting with one of Project Veritas‘ undercover self-described guerilla journalists. “You know most people are dumb.”
Beller is just saying what I would hear over and over again in Washington D.C. parties and pubs. He’s not the exception and his disdain for our nation makes my stomach turn because he, and others like him, are seizing power from the people every day. They hold positions of power that actually can affect our daily lives and that of our children.
And to think PBS if funded with our taxpayer dollars.
“Kids who are growing up, know nothing but Trump, for four years, you’ve got to wonder what they’re (Trump supporting children) going to be like, ” Beller told the undercover journalist. “They’ll (Trump supporters) be raising a generation of intolerant, horrible people – horrible kids.”
Beller suggests removing the children from parents who supported Trump and then sending them to enlightenment camps.
IS BELLER FOR REAL!
This idea is similar to what is actually happening in China, as the Chinese Communist Party has been terrorizing and removing the Uighur Muslim population to supposed “re-education” camps.
Beller needs to be fired by PBS. My daughter watches PBS and she won’t be anymore. This is absolutely intolerable.
Oh, Beller also said that if “even if Biden wins, we go for all the Republican voters, Homeland Security will take their children away…”
Folks, welcome to America’s worst nightmare.
BREAKING: @PBS Principal Counsel Michael Beller Incites Political Violence In Radical Left-Wing Agenda
“Go to the White House & throw Molotov cocktails…”
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/23400-pbs20lawyer.PNG394700Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-12 18:31:212021-01-13 02:58:20So it Begins… Concentration Camps For Trump Voters | Sara Carter
The Fascists Take Control of all Neurological Pathways.
They own what you think | The_Void
The President must not be allowed to speak to the people. A similar thing happened during the French Revolution to Maximilien Robespierre, back then they shot him in the mouth. It is perceivable that this bloody period in western history could repeat itself in the present day.
Never have we felt more pessimistic about the future than we do today. The set-up and vilification of the greatest President in living memory has been nothing short of evil. It’s almost as though Satan has won and now controls the world.
Twitter silences the sitting President of The United States of America
These big tech Oligarchs understand how social media has become essential for many aspects of daily life and it’s that crucial element they’ll exploit to moderate and control us.
The Chinese social credit system has given these elites so many ideas and insights into how easy it is to remove peoples hope and destroy resistance. Banking will be the next the stop for these power mad castigators, after that we’ll all have the same rights as lab rats.
Statement by Parler CEO, John Matze
I know many people are still hanging on to the hope of a last minute reprieve from the madness, but we have to recognise the peril and organise. We have to find alternative ways to communicate, because I can’t see the likes of Parler lasting much longer now that they’re firmly in the sights of the globalist tech tyranny. These are crucial days for the survival of freedom loving people. We have to stay in touch.
I wonder if Orwell ever really believed that ‘thought crime’ could happen in western democratic societies?
His dystopian vision has turned into the template of terror being waged on all conservative thinkers and non conformists.Philip K Dick got even closer with his visions of our dystopian future. Fahrenheit 451 by American writer Ray Bradbury nailed it.
Thought is our personal property until thought is a crime.
Wealth has become power not democracy.
A few people own the world.
This destruction was planned
Many literary greats have painted nightmarish visions of the future.
None of them thought they would come true. Almost all thought human progression was inexorable and unstoppable. How wrong they were. Our demise has been simple; Turn us all against each other and control the survivors. The untouchables can never be got at. Fuckerberg and Bezos both employ private armies full highly trained special forces. They live in impenetrable facilities. Often on islands, always behind the highest security it’s possible to achieve. ‘The secret rulers of the world.’
People are silenced when power fears what they say. It has been the same with tyrannies throughout history, If they can control what you say then they can control what you think. They can make you believe a man with a beard is a child. A woman is a man. Good people are evil. Corrupt people have your best interests at heart. That the greedy are philanthropists. It’s a simulation. A false paradigm. A conjuring trick. And it works all too often. Zuckerberg and Dorsey are not good people who care about humanity, they’re super rich elites who have no other compunction than to save everything for themselves.
It seems we are entering another dark period in human history.
As we write we no longer know how long our newsfeed will be available – surely its only a matter of time until they come for us like they’re coming for everyone else. We sometimes wonder if they’ll come for us personally. We wonder if they’ll come for our families. All we know is that we will go down still defying these horrendous fascists.
The speed with which people are being disappeared and silenced is breathtaking.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The_Void-Censored-Stamp.jpg13332000Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-09 01:20:142021-01-16 03:31:42The Night Of The Long Knives | Opinion
ABC News Hack calls for ‘Cleansing’ America Of Trump Supporters.
In a column and tweet (posted Today) ABC’s political director and top brown coat Rick Klein basically called for the genocide of Trump voters (all 75 million of them) after yesterday’s pro-democracy, pro-Trump, anti-voter fraud protests inside the halls of Congress.
(This tweet has now been deleted).
After getting badly ratio’d, the cowardly would-be gas chamber guard immediately deleted his fascist tweet. This is exactly the type of person tyrannical regimes employ to justify their heinous acts.
The psychopath went on to say,
“Even aside from impeachment and 25th Amendment talk, Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days. The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part,”
Klein wrote in his popular blog.
“Cleansing the movement he commands, or getting rid of what he represents to so many Americans, is going to be something else,”
he added, drawing conclusions that it sounded a little bit too much like Adolf Hitler in his heyday.
‘Cleansing’ was a very deliberate choice of words and the connotations it brings need no explaining. Those with good survival instincts know something very dark is coming.
During the entire four years of his presidency, the Fake News have called President Trump an authoritarian and a fascist. As you can see from this… It is nothing more than Projection. Pure and simple.
This is how the Marxists behave now, wait until they get power…
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/22930-Rick-Klein.jpg420624Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-08 15:34:512021-01-08 19:55:20ABC News Hack Talks About The Genocide of Trump Supporters | Opinion
Scottish police go ‘Full Metal Jacket’ on family over suspected ‘support bubble breach.’
Stormtrooper Cops break into family home and beat up mother in front of her children after being suspected of having a friend round for tea | The_Void
In scenes reminiscent of a seventies cold war movie, steroid throbbing goons barged their way through the door of a family home before threatening and dragging a helpless woman to the ground and beating her up in front of her traumatised children.
“We have reviewed a lot of poor and unlawful policing during the pandemic. This may be the most heinous and senseless example yet.”
Big Brother Watch
It’s hard to talk about this horror, so..
Here are the videos posted by Big Brother Watch. We advise you to have calming measures in place before watching.
"Protecting public health".@PoliceScotland stormed into a family home yesterday – on suspicion they had guests around… In fact their seriously ill daughter had just been discharged from hospital.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Flu-World-Order-960x540-1.gif540960The Managerhttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgThe Manager2021-01-07 17:58:462021-01-08 07:23:20The Most Appalling Thing to Come Out of The UK’s Covid Madness Yet | Contains Distressing Scenes
According to RT, the departed were among the first in the country to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Medical authorities said they will investigate the circumstances of these deaths to try and figure out if the vaccines had anything to do with it. Norway’s National Institute of Public Health will be leading the charge.
“We have to assess whether the vaccine is the cause of death, or if it is a coincidence that it happened soon after vaccination,” Medical Director Steiner Madsen said in a statement to the press.
To be sure, due to the advanced age of the residents, it’s possible their deaths were unrelated to the vaccine.
Around 400 people die every week in Norwegian nursing homes (on a tangential note, we can’t help but wonder how many deaths in these facilities have been mislabeled as “COVID-19 deaths”).
As we reported the other day, the rate of “adverse” reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine might already be as much as 50x higher than the flu vaccine.
Vaccinations with the drug began in Norway on Dec. 27. Scientists in the US and elsewhere have criticised European leaders for the slow rollout of vaccinations (with France coming in for particularly intense criticism). The pace is set to quicken, however, now that the EMA has approved Moderna’s mRNA vaccine for emergency use in the EU on Wednesday.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/22818-PFIZER2.jpg394700Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-07 14:46:012021-01-07 14:51:38Norwegian Nursing Home Patients Dead After Receiving First Dose Of Pfizer Vaccine | ZeroHedge
Far-Right-Left-Footed Striker who’s good with his head gets ‘Fashed’ off.
Woke Mobs Are Looking For Sacrificial Lambs Everywhere.
One of the worlds great strikers decides to grace the Premier League by joining Manchester United and is immediately branded a bigoted racist by the FA, The BBC and all and sundry.
With no consideration for his language, culture, or intention, the pile-on was immediate. He was labelled for life by the media, the FA and every other uneducated, virtue signalling hypocrite as a racist and then punished with a three match ban and a £100,000 fine.
This does NOTHING to either PROMOTE or SOLVE the issue of racial equality… punishing someone for doing NOTHING WRONG, will IGNORING and dealing with REAL issues of racial inequality, while trying to convince us that we are moving forward.
The word translates as ‘little black person’. It is commonly used as a term of endearment in Uruguay, and many other Spanish-speaking countries, but it is considered offensive elsewhere. (ie in Woketopia)
The offending post. Instagram/ Edinson Cavani
The punishment was immediate for the far-right-two-footed striker.
Condemned. Labeled. Denigrated. Castigated. And subsequently ordered to undergo a period of reeducation.
The Marxist Fascist template in a nutshell. They’re coming for the opiate of the masses. If allowed it will have the usual marxist ending with the destruction of the sport.
The only racism here it would seem, is the BBC and the FA’s failure to understand and consider a Uraguayan’s language and culture.
As for the great Uruguayan himself, from a country that has experience of Marxism and Fascism, he maintains his dignity.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/22575-NINTCHDBPICT000627975770-e1609784176408.jpg8001200Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-05 15:47:292021-01-05 21:47:24The Strange Case of Edinson Cavani and the Fake Hate Crime | Opinion