Global Technocracy | Richard D. Hall
Technocratic Threat
Global Technocracy – January 2025 | Richard D. Hall
“Global Technocracy“, which is impacting on humanity in an increasing way every day. Included is an analysis of the current rush by most countries in the world towards Central Bank Digital Currency, with contributions from Iain Davis.
Iain adds the following comments to the programme ….
“I would add that if the PIPs can program money, their access to wholesale CBDC will be dependent upon them supporting government policy initiatives. “Interoperability” means privately issued digital coins, such as stablecoins, will be “interoperable” with the proposed CBDC system. Therefore, private programmable digital money will enable commercial banks to operate a CBDC system in all but name. JPMorgan’s Kinexys is clearly designed for that purpose for example. … Just because central and commercial banks (in the West) say “they” won’t program CBDC, if commercial banks can program their own digital coins, as they collectively form a public-private partnership, they will program digital money-whether it is called CBDC or not-to meet policy objectives. The Hybrid Model best facilitates this because the CBDC is just wholesale (not programmed) but all the commercial activity in the “economy” takes place using “interoperable” digital coins issued by commercial banks and it is here that the “programming” takes place. CBDC certainly will not cut commercial banks out of the system. Commercial banks have the upper-hand in the “partnership” in my view.”
Iain Davis
Technocracy Rising
The rise of technocracy and the globalist agenda presents a formidable challenge to humanity, often veiled in the language of progress and efficiency. The_Void delves into the dangers posed by these trends, particularly focusing on how they manipulate psychological perceptions, employ propaganda, and engage in social engineering to control populations.
The Dehumanising Nature of Technocracy
Technocracy, defined as governance by technical experts, often prioritises efficiency over humanity. As Pope Francis highlighted, this “dehumanising trend” reduces individuals to mere objects within a system designed to optimise outputs rather than nurture human dignity. The implications are profound: when people are viewed as data points or resources, their intrinsic value is diminished. This perspective promotes a culture where human relationships are mediated by algorithms, leading to isolation and a false sense of belonging among individuals.
The technocratic model operates on a flawed anthropology that sees human beings not as holistic entities but as machines to be optimised. This dualistic view, which separates the body from the mind and spirit, perpetuates a crisis of identity and purpose. In this framework, individuals become subservient to institutions that prioritise profit and efficiency over compassionate care and ethical considerations.
Psychological Manipulation Through Propaganda
The technocratic agenda employs sophisticated propaganda techniques to shape public perception and behaviour. By leveraging fear-based narratives and misinformation, technocrats manipulate societal beliefs and actions. For instance, during political campaigns or public health crises, leaders invoke threats—real or perceived—to justify invasive measures that encroach upon personal freedoms.
This manipulation is particularly evident in the digital realm, where social media platforms amplify divisive narratives and misinformation. The spread of fake news not only distorts reality but also encourages distrust among citizens, creating an environment ripe for control.
As people become increasingly reliant on curated information streams, their ability to critically engage with diverse perspectives diminishes.
The Globalist Agenda: A Threat to Autonomy
The globalist agenda often champions interconnectedness and cooperation; however, it masks a more insidious goal: the erosion of national sovereignty and individual autonomy. By promoting policies that prioritise global governance over local decision-making, technocrats undermine democratic processes. This shift leads to a concentration of power in the hands of unelected elites who operate without accountability to the public.
Moreover, technocratic governance leads to the normalisation of surveillance and control mechanisms under the guise of security or efficiency. Digital IDs, biometric recognition systems, and smart technologies facilitate unprecedented levels of monitoring—transforming citizens into subjects under constant observation. Such systems not only invade privacy but also stifle dissent by creating an atmosphere of fear where individuals are discouraged from challenging authority.
The Dangers of Social Engineering
Social engineering tactics employed by technocrats further exacerbate these issues. By manipulating societal norms and values through targeted campaigns, they shape public behaviour in ways that align with their objectives. This manipulation often occurs without individuals’ conscious awareness, making it all the more dangerous.
For example, the medicalisation of health care under technocratic oversight has led to commodification—where patients are treated as users rather than individuals with unique needs. This shift not only compromises compassionate care but also reinforces a narrative that prioritises technological solutions over holistic approaches to health and well-being.
Resisting Technocratic Control
As we confront the realities of technocracy and its globalist agenda, it is crucial to recognise the inherent dangers these trends pose to humanity. The manipulation of psychological perceptions through propaganda and social engineering threatens our autonomy, dignity, and fundamental freedoms.
To resist this encroachment on human rights, individuals must cultivate critical thinking skills and promote genuine connections that transcend algorithmic interactions. By remaining vigilant against dehumanising trends and advocating for accountability in governance, we can reclaim our agency in an increasingly mechanised world. The fight for human dignity against the tide of technocratic control is not just necessary; it is imperative for the preservation of humanity.
Source: Global Technocracy | Richard D. Hall
Leave a Comment
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!