Barbara O’Neill – The Real Threat to Public Safety | The Delingpod

Rate this post

Natural Health

Barbara O'Neill – June 2024 |

Barbara O'Neill is a health teacher and coach who believes in the body's natural healing potential.

Barbara O'Neill is an Australian alternative health promoter who has been permanently banned from providing any health services in due to what the authorities have described as “dangerous and misleading medical advice”. 

However, things aren't quite what they seem…

The Persecution of Barbara O'Neill

A Case Study in Propaganda and Social Engineering

The case of Barbara O'Neill, a controversial Australian health practitioner, provides a fascinating glimpse into the complex interplay of politics, vested interests, and the suppression of alternative viewpoints in the medical field. O'Neill's story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of and , and the importance of questioning official narratives.

In 2019, the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) permanently banned O'Neill from providing any health services, citing her promotion of “unsubstantiated treatments” and her discouragement of mainstream medical interventions like chemotherapy and vaccination.

However, a closer examination of the case reveals a more nuanced and troubling picture. O'Neill's husband was involved in a political party that opposed some mainstream medical institutions, raising the possibility that the case against her may have been politically motivated retaliation. The HCCC's characterisation of O'Neill's statements, such as the claim about “baking soda injections,” does not seem to be supported by direct evidence from her own words, undermining the credibility of the case against her.

Moreover, O'Neill's case appears to be part of a broader pattern of suppressing alternative health perspectives that challenge the medical establishment. Groups like the Friends of Science in Medicine have been accused of using their influence to discredit and silence dissenting voices, even when they are not causing direct harm. This raises concerns about freedom of speech and the ability to question mainstream dogma.

The O'Neill case highlights the power of and in shaping public opinion and influencing policy decisions. By framing O'Neill as a dangerous quack, the medical establishment and its political allies have been able to dismiss her views and silence her voice, regardless of the merits of her arguments or the lack of direct evidence of harm. The case against O'Neill appears to be more complex than it initially seems, with political motivations, lack of direct evidence, and broader suppression of alternative viewpoints all playing a role.

As citizens, it is crucial that we remain vigilant and question the official narratives presented by those in power. We must be willing to examine the evidence critically, consider alternative perspectives, and resist the temptation to simply accept what we are told, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like health and medicine.

– Barbara O'Neill

The persecution of Barbara O'Neill serves as a stark reminder of the power of and , and the importance of maintaining a free and open society where all ideas, no matter how unconventional, can be debated and scrutinised. By understanding and resisting these forces, we can work towards a more just and equitable world, where truth and reason triumph over dogma and manipulation.

Sources and links

Barbara O'Neill's book “Self Heal by Design: The Role of Micro-Organisms for Health”

Barbara O'Neill's Wikipedia page 

Intimidated And Censored: What Really Happened To Barbara O'Neill?

Source: Barbera O'Neill


You need to login or register to bookmark/favorite this content.

Spotlight / Library / Archives / My_Void /
To report this post you need to login first.
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply