Sponsor
image 78

Kary Mullis – PCR Test is Not a Diagnostic Test | Quick Guide

Rate this post

PCR Test is Not a Diagnostic Test |

The Truth About PCR Tests |

: The Fraud of the PCR Test | Richard D. Hall

Molecular Deception

and the Illusion of Diagnosis:

The Legacy of Kary Mullis and the Weaponisation of Molecular Replication

, the inventor of the PCR test and 1993 Nobel Prize laureate, warned against using PCR as a diagnostic tool because it amplifies tiny biological fragments regardless of disease.

This method revolutionised research because it allowed detection of very small amounts of these pieces. However, Mullis warned that this tool should not be used as a way to diagnose illnesses because it can make many copies of even the smallest fragments present, whether or not those fragments actually indicate a real disease or problem. In other words, the test might show something is there even if it doesn’t actually mean someone is sick.

Cycle Amplification

The PCR test works like a very powerful copy machine for tiny pieces of biological material. Instead of detecting illness directly, it makes repeated copies of these tiny pieces, doubling the amount with each round. Imagine starting with just one tiny snippet, and after 20 rounds of copying, you have over a million identical snippets. After 40 rounds, you could have a trillion copies or more. This ability to create so many copies makes the process extremely sensitive, but it can also cause problems, because even the smallest trace can be amplified to a large amount, which doesn’t mean someone is actually sick.

Sponsor
14Mullis1 videoSixteenByNineJumbo1600
, inventor of the PCR test, conveniently died months before the COVID scare; he had warned that PCR is not a reliable diagnostic tool for detecting disease.

Mullis warned that by increasing the number of replication cycles, the PCR test can detect practically anything present in minuscule amounts—whether that presence has clinical significance or not. This is a crucial distinction often overlooked or purposely ignored in mainstream narratives. Almost every person harbours tiny quantities of numerous molecular sequences that do not cause illness. The PCR test amplifies these fragments without distinction, leading to false positives or results that may not correlate with actual disease.

The PCR Fraud

This misuse of is more than a medical or scientific issue—it represents a potent vector for , propaganda, and . By defining infection solely by the presence of genetic fragments amplified to detectable levels, governments and health authorities created a constant flow of alarming “cases.” This engineered perception has been instrumental in maintaining widespread fear, compliance, and social control. The phenomenon begs the question: how much of this “pandemic” narrative was supported by meaningful diagnostic data versus an amplified illusion?

The story machine, controlled by powerful vested interests, thrives on such distortions. Its primary objective is to preserve the illusion system—the constructed reality designed to manipulate mass perception and behaviour. When the public begins to question the reliability of the testing upon which so many restrictions and medical interventions are justified, cracks appear in this illusion. The parasitic psychopathy driving these narratives fears nothing more than widespread collective memory and critical awareness that fractures its control.

This brings us full circle to ‘s warnings: the PCR test, celebrated as a miracle of molecular biology, was never intended—or adequate—for the role it has been forced to play in mass diagnostic screening. It is largely a tool of molecular replication, not a definitive arbiter of illness. The consequences of ignoring this truth extend beyond individual health to undermine entire societies by weaponising fear and doubt, controlling behaviour under the guise of science.

In recognising this, readers who are attuned to the subtleties of hidden hands steering world events should consider not as a neutral clinical process but as a component of a much larger theatre of influence. Mullis’s legacy is not just the invention of PCR, but a cautionary tale about scientific tools conscripted into service for agendas far beyond their original scope—and the importance of remembering that science, when divorced from transparency and integrity, becomes a powerful instrument of .

This reflection encourages us to look beyond surface narratives and question the frameworks through which data and diagnosis are presented, especially in crises laden with political and economic stakes. The battle to illuminate the truth about is part of a larger struggle against the machinery of control, propaganda, and the invisibility of the powers operating behind the scenes.

Source: Kary Mullis explains why his PCR test is not a diagnostic test – YouTube

Save this post into a collection.

You need to login or register to bookmark/favorite this content.

Spotlight /Library /Box Box Archives /User User My Account /
Star Star Join The_Void
Heart Heart Support The_Void
0 comments

Leave a Comment

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply