London Blackmailed by New Age Death Cult | Sam William
The Protest Spontaneously Appeared as if by Magick
London Blackmailed by New Age Death Cult – 21 Apr 2019 | Sam William
Extinction Rebellion appeared out of nowhere in 2018, as if by magic, out of thin air, fully formed and ready to go. Some people still imagine this is a ‘grassroots’ organisation.
Extinction Rebellion
Grassroots Movement or Controlled Opposition?
Extinction Rebellion (XR) magically emerged as a prominent environmental movement since its inception in 2018, advocating for urgent action against climate change through nonviolent civil disobedience. However, many critics argue that XR serves as a form of controlled opposition, aligning with broader agendas such as Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This perspective raises questions about the origins, funding, and potential ties to government agencies, the motivations and affiliations of its founders, Roger Hallam and Gail Bradbrook, as well as the movement’s impact on public discourse around climate action.
The Founders: Roger Hallam and Gail Bradbrook
XR was co-founded by Roger Hallam and Gail Bradbrook, who have been described as “change agents” within the movement. Hallam, in particular, has been a central figure in XR’s genesis, prophesying a profound shift in climate activism that materialised through the creation of the movement.
Bradbrook, on the other hand, has brought a blend of scientific acumen and spiritual depth to XR’s foundation. Both Hallam and Bradbrook have been named in the press as leaders of the social movement, despite XR’s claims of being leaderless.
Funding and Ties to Government
One of the most concerning aspects of XR is its potential ties to government and the sources of its funding. While the movement has not been transparent about its financial backers, there are indications that it may be receiving support from entities with vested interests in promoting the Agenda 2030 and SDGs.
The Agenda 2030 and SDGs, adopted by the United Nations in 2015, claimed aim is to address global challenges such as poverty, inequality, so-called “climate change“, environmental degradation, peace, and justice. However, critics argue that these goals are being used as a cover for a more sinister agenda, one that seeks to centralise power and control under the guise of sustainable development.
XR’s demands, which include government action on climate change and the establishment of so-called “citizens’ assembly” to guide policy decisions, align with the broader objectives of the Agenda 2030 and SDGs. This raises questions about whether the movement is being used as a tool to advance these goals, at the expense of genuine grassroots activism.
Controlled Opposition and Psychological Manipulation
The concept of “controlled opposition” refers to a group or movement that appears to be opposing the establishment but is actually being manipulated by that same establishment to achieve its own goals. In the context of XR, the movement’s disruptive tactics, while effective in drawing attention to the climate crisis, may also be serving to discredit and marginalise genuine environmental activism.
Moreover, XR’s emphasis on nonviolent civil disobedience and mass arrests could be seen as a form of psychological manipulation, designed to create a sense of urgency and desperation among its supporters. By portraying the climate crisis as an existential threat that requires drastic action, XR is playing on people’s fears and emotions to garner support for its agenda.
Conclusion
The lack of transparency surrounding XR’s funding and the dubious activities of its founders raise red flags. As with any social movement, it is crucial to approach XR with a critical eye and to question the motives and agendas of those involved.
Source: London Blackmailed By New Age Death Cult – YouTube
Leave a Comment
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!